Friday, May 26, 2006 

Chicken or Egg? Million Dollar Question Answered!!!

Scientists say they have finally solved the riddle! They now claim they can state with authority what came first - the chicken or the egg.

For centuries, the question has tickled imagination and thought. The conundrum has been used, misused and abused by mathematicians, philosophers, writers, and chefs.

But now a team consisting of a geneticist, a philosopher and a chicken farmer - hmm, I say, that has the makings of an awful joke now, doesn't it?

"So a geneticist, a philosopher and a chicken farmer walked into a bar. 'I'll have a scrambled egg,' said the geneticist, while the farmer said, 'I'll have a chicken sandwich*' and the philosopher waited and watched to see which came first - the chicken or the egg!"

* so this bar serves scrambled eggs and chicken sandwiches, what's your problem?

Alright, alright, don't reach for the Back button yet!

Anyway, the geneticist, philosopher and chicken farmer have claimed to have found the answer. And the answer is....how about I ask you to scroll down further and further to find the answer?

Naah, you'll probably never come back to read my blog again.

And the answer is.......THE EGG

You are a lucky bugger if you are just satisfied with the answer and go on with your life. But if you are one of those types that insist on knowing the "whys" and the "wherefores", well, don't say I didn't warn you!

Apparently, the first chicken developed differently to its avian predecessors, including its parents!

Did that make sense to you?

In case it didn't, what it really means is that new species evolve through mutation and so, the thingamajig that came out of this egg was the first chicken ever, because it was different from its mommy and its daddy.

The DNA of the bird didn't change during its lifetime, so it couldn't have decided to become a chicken one fine sunny January morning. (Hey, its summer in Australia, our Januaries are a helluvamonth!)

And since the bird didn't change into a chicken during its lifetime, it stands to reason, say the big guns, that it hatched into a chicken.

Says Charles Bournes, Chairman of the trade body Great British Chicken, "As far as I am concerned, it has to be the egg that came first. Eggs were around long before the first chicken arrived."

That finally puts to rest the long-standing debate of what came first. It is unarguably, the Egg.

Now the big question is "So who laid the dammed egg?"

 

50 years too late!!!

In Hildesheim, Germany, an old great-grandmother suddenly remembered that she was also a mother and it was her duty to keep her daughter in line! So this 92 year old darling called up social services to complain about her daughter's "loose behaviour" and asked them to reprimand her. The only problem is the daughter is 68 years old herself!

The mother rang with "tales of infidelity and philandering" but officials in the German city of Hildesheim told her she was about 50 years too late. Her daughter was not exactly under 18!

Police went to smooth things over. The daughter, a former school teacher, told them: "Forgive her. She's a daft old bat."

Hmm, mothers! Don't you just love them!



In other news, a man being tried for murder didn't exactly help his lawyer when he went for the latter's throat. The man John Gomes charged with murder in Massachusetts was so angry with his lawyer's performance that he attacked the attorney in court, trying to strangle him as a shocked judge looked on.

The defence had to rest! The lawyer is trying to find his voice.

Thursday, May 25, 2006 

Sleep away your fat!

A very large study has found a surprisingly strong link between the amount of sleep people get and their risk of becoming obese.

Oh yes, it was done in the US! You’d think they invented surveys and studies. They certainly invented obesity and so it is only fair that they spend as much time as they can, trying to reverse it.


And this one is a dream come true! Literally!


Here’s the lowdown:


Sleep less than four hours and you are 73 percent more likely to be obese than if got the recommended seven to nine hours of rest, so scientists have discovered.


Those who averaged five hours of sleep had 50 percent greater risk, and those who got six hours had 23 percent more.


The study was led by Dr. Steven Heymsfield of Columbia University and St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital in New York and James Gangwisch, a Columbia epidemiologist.


They used information on about 18,000 adults participating in the federal government's National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, or NHANES, throughout the 1980s.


This is too good to be true! I mean, all I have to do now is sleep and voila, I wake up a thinner man!


But you know, much as I would like this to be true, the scientist in me rebels. Hey, what are you looking at me like that for? Of course there is a scientist in me. Somewhere!


So this scientist in me protests and says “That’s preposterous! There is no way you can reduce the chances of obesity by sleeping.”


But then the rest of me rationalizes, “Aw, what the hell! If the real scientist blokes say it, it’s gotta be true, djunowatimeen?”


And so I decided to give it a shot. And that led to the discovery of the real truth behind the whole study! And this is how that happened.


The Wife: Get up, you fat steak, you are late for work! I haven’t seen a lazier man than you ever


Me, filled with righteous indignation: I will have you know that I am not lazy. In fact, right up till this moment before you disturbed me, I was very busy shedding weight.


The Wife: You’ve been lying in your bed all day! What do you mean shedding weight?


Me: Oh you wouldn’t understand. It is too scientific for you. But every minute you stand there talking to me, I am putting on some weight. So please do me a favour and go away. Let me sleep...um…lose weight in peace


The Wife: If you really want to lose weight, get up and exercise or something!


Me: You ignorant woman, you live in the Dark Ages! Exercise is old news, obsolete, poof! Sleeping is the in thing! The more you sleep, the slimmer you become! It is all part of a new study, I tell you.


The Wife, thinking for a minute: Well, it does make sense in a way. At least, you will eat less if you sleep more. Most of your waking hours are devoted to eating!


Eureka! So that's it! The secret Heymsfield and Gangwisch have left unsaid. Trust the wife to clear up the obfuscation!


Sleep more, eat less, lose weight! Huh, what's the fun in that, now?

Wednesday, May 24, 2006 

The Return of the Muse!!!

So after…hmm, let’s see now – November, December, January, February, March, April, May – seven whole months!!! I don’t believe it! Time simply flies! Well, anyway, so after seven long months, the Muse is back, ready to take up where we left off last.


And among the first things in the To Do list is to acknowledge all who had, during the Muse’s long absence, visited this blog and clamoured – yes actually clamoured – for more!


Truly, I am flattered! Thank you!


Of course, I am not going to go about giving any elaborate and long-winded but patently false excuse for my extended silence. It would not be fair to anyone, least of all to myself.


So, what shall we blog about today?


A serious issue that seems to be gripping the Indian blogosphere these days is the reservation question. The GoI seems all set to table the bill that reserves 49.5 percent of seats in educational institutions to the so-called “lower-caste” candidates. A whopping 49.5 %, stopping just short of the magic number 50%, no doubt based on recommendations of several psycho-statistical analyses.


And since the brain cells are yet to get into the blog mode, I shall pass off a forward doing its rounds in the email today. It is funny, really! Here’s what the author has to say.


I think we should have job reservations in all the fields. I completely support the PM and all the politicians for promoting this. Let's start the reservation with our cricket team. We should have 9.5% reservation for Muslims, 40% percent for OBC, and SC/ST, totaling of course to 49.5%.


Cricket rules should be modified accordingly. The boundary circle should be reduced for an SC/ST player. The four hit by an OBC player should be considered as a six and a six hit by an OBC player should be counted as 8 runs. An OBC century is 60 runs.


We should influence ICC and make rules so that the pace bowlers like Shoaib Akhtar should not bowl fast balls to our OBC player. Bowlers can be allowed a maximum speed of 80 kilometer per hour when playing against an OBC player. Any delivery above this speed should be made illegal.



Well, if one must have reservations, them bring ‘em aboard, but as the author astutely points out, bring them in all fields. Oh, what an edge we will have in the international scene!

Tuesday, November 08, 2005 

Vacayshun!!

Yup, its time for a well-deserved break. The Muse is homeward bound to India. So blogging is adjourned sine die

About Me

  • Satchitananda Sai
  • From
My profile

Recommended Specs

This site is best viewed in Firefox/Opera/Safari/Netscape with a resolution of 1024x768. If you have IE, well, what can I say...go get a life and Firefox


Recent Posts

Archives

Other Interesting Blogs


Subscribe

    Like what you see here? Enter your email address below to subscribe to Random Musings and get new posts direct to your inbox


    powered by Bloglet

Credits


    Blogarama - The Blogs Directory

    Get Firefox!
    Powered by Blogger
    and Blogger Templates

Track referers to your site with referer.org free referrer feed.